The Advances Toward Renewable Energy Storage

energy-storage

 

Renewable energy holds the great promises of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, obtaining an endless supply of energy, and lowering the overall cost of energy. However, there are times when solar and wind farms generate more electricity than is needed by consumers.

 

Storing the surplus of renewable energy in batteries for later use seems like the obvious solution, but a new study from Stanford University suggests this might not always be the case.

 

“We looked at batteries and other promising technologies for storing solar and wind energy on the electrical grid,” said Charles Barnhart, the lead author of the study and a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford’s Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP).

 

“Our primary goal was to calculate their overall energetic cost — that is, the total amount of fuel and electricity required to build and operate these storage technologies. We found that when you factor in the energy costs, grid-scale batteries make sense for storing surplus solar energy, but not for wind.”

 

Renewable Energy and Climate Change

Most of the electricity in the United States is generated at power plants that run on coal and natural gas, fossil fuels that significantly contribute to global warming by emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide. Solar and wind power are emissions-free and renewable but depend on sunlight or wind to operate.

 

“For the grid to function efficiently, the power supply needs to match power demand at all times, but with renewables, that’s not always the case,” Barnhart said. “For example, wind farms sometimes produce too much electricity at night when demand is low. That excess energy has to be stored or used elsewhere. Otherwise, it will be lost. However, the U.S. grid has insufficient storage capacity.”

 

The lack of grid-scale storage has touched off the development of a wide variety of technologies to address the problem. The Stanford team looked at several emerging technologies, including five battery types, lead-acid, lithium-ion, sodium-sulphur, vanadium-redox, and zinc-bromine.

 

In a previous study, Barnhart calculated the energetic cost of building and maintaining each of the five battery systems for grid-scale storage. Lead-acid batteries had the highest energetic cost, and lithium-ion had the lowest.

 

“We calculated how much energy is used over the full lifecycle of the battery — from the mining of raw materials to the installation of the finished device,” Barnhart said. “Batteries with high energetic cost consume more fossil fuels and therefore release more carbon dioxide over their lifetime. If a battery’s energetic cost is too high, its overall contribution to global warming could negate the environmental benefits of the wind or solar farm it was supposed to support.”

 

Barnhart and his colleagues calculated the energetic cost of grid-scale photovoltaic solar cells and wind turbines for this study.

 

“Both wind turbines and photovoltaics deliver more energy than it takes to build and maintain them,” said GCEP postdoctoral scholar Michael Dale, a co-author of the study. “However, our calculations showed that the overall energetic cost of wind turbines is much lower than conventional solar panels, which require lots of energy, primarily from fossil fuels, for processing silicon and fabricating other components.”

 

Store it or Shut it Down

The scientists next looked at the cost of curtailment, or the practice of shutting down solar panels and wind turbines to reduce the production of surplus electricity on the grid.

 

“Curtailment of renewable resources seems wasteful,” Barnhart said. “But grid operators routinely curtail wind turbines to avoid a sudden, unexpected surge of excess electricity that could overload transmission lines and cause blackouts. Curtailmevnt rates in the U.S. will likely increase as renewable energy becomes more prevalent.”

 

Shutting down a clean source of electricity seems counterproductive, but is storing surplus energy in batteries a practical alternative?

 

To find out, the researchers compared the energetic cost of curtailing solar and wind power, versus the energetic cost of grid-scale storage. Their calculations were based on a formula known as “energy return on investment” — the amount of energy produced by a technology, divided by the amount of energy it takes to build and maintain it.

 

Using that formula, the researchers found that the amount of energy required to create a solar farm is comparable to the energy used to build each of the five battery technologies. “Using batteries to store solar power during periods of low demand would, therefore, be energetically favourable,” Dale said.

 

The results were quite different for wind farms. The scientists found that curtailing wind power reduces the energy return on investment by 10 percent. However, storing surplus wind-generated electricity in batteries results in even more significant reductions — from about 20 percent for lithium-ion batteries to more than 50 percent for lead-acid.

 

“Ideally, the energetic cost of curtailing a resource should at least equal the amount of energy it cost to store it,” Dale said. “That’s the case for photovoltaics, but for wind farms, the energetic cost of curtailment is much lower than it is for batteries. Therefore, it would be more energetically efficient to shut down a wind turbine than to store the surplus electricity it generates.”

 

He compared it to buying a safe. “You wouldn’t spend a $100 on a safe to store a $10 watch,” he said. “Likewise, it’s not sensible to build energetically expensive batteries for an energetically cheap resource like wind, but it does make sense for photovoltaic systems, which require lots of energy to produce.”

 

Increasing the cycle life of a battery would be the most effective way to improve its energetic performance, Barnhart added. Conventional lithium-ion batteries last about four years or 6,000 charge-discharge cycles. Lead-acid batteries only last about 700 cycles. To efficiently store energy on the grid, batteries must endure 10,000 to 18,000 cycles, he said.

 

“Storing energy consumes energy, and curtailing energy wastes it,” Barnhart said. “In either case, the result is a reduction in the overall energy return on investment.”

 

More options

In addition to batteries, the researchers considered other technologies for storing renewable energy, such as pumped hydroelectric storage, which uses surplus electricity to pump water into a reservoir behind a dam. Later, when demand for energy is high, the stored water is released through turbines in the dam to generate electricity.

 

“Pumped hydro is used in 99 percent of grid storage today, ” Barnhart said. “It works fantastically from an energetic perspective for both wind and solar. Its energy return on investment is 10 times better than conventional batteries. But there are geologic and environmental constraints on where pumped hydro can be deployed.”

 

Storage is not the only way to improve grid reliability. “Energy that would otherwise be lost during times of excess could be used to pump water for irrigation or to charge a fleet of electric vehicles, for example,” Dale said.

 

It’s essential for society to be energy-smart about implementing new technologies, Barnhart added. “Policymakers and investors need to consider the energetic cost as well as the financial cost of new technologies,” he said. “If economics is the sole focus, then less expensive technologies that require significant amounts of energy for their manufacture, maintenance and replacement might win out — even if they ultimately increase greenhouse gas emissions and negate the long-term benefits of implementing wind and solar power.”


“Our goal is to understand what’s needed to build a scalable low-carbon energy system,” said co-author Sally Benson, the director of GCEP and a professor of energy resources engineering. “Energy return on investment is one of those metrics that shed light on potential roadblocks. Hopefully, this study will provide a performance target to guide future research on grid-scale energy storage.”

 

Thank you for taking the time to visit my blog. If you enjoyed this article, please join my mailing list to make sure you do not miss a single informative and entertaining article as soon as it is published. I encourage you to start or join a discussion by adding a comment at the end of the article.

 

Also, I can help you with any of your professional content needs, including original blog articles, website content and all other forms of content management and marketing.

 

Please contact me at michael@mdtcreative.com, and I will put my 15+ years of experience to work for you.

 

Let’s Spread the Words Together!

Advertisements

Please join the conversation with your input.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s